Chicago police have been increasing their supply of riot-control
equipment, including the controversial long-range acoustic device
(LRAD), also known as a "sound cannon," in the lead-up to the NATO
summit protests the weekend of May 19.
Chicago police have engaged in a "pre-emptive" raid against
peace activists that planned to protest against the NATO summit. The raid is believed
to have taken place late last night in the Bridgeport neighbourhood of
Chicago, Kevin Gosztola
NATO is the military alliance directed by the USA along with it's European client states, and which waged a war of aggression against Libya last year, displacing a million people and resulting in the death of over 100,000 citizens in the North African country.
The excuse given for the bombing of Libya, was that the Libyan people's democratic government had planned to conduct a "pre-emptive" raid against demonstrators, exactly the same thing the Chicago police are doing, even though in Libya later evidence revealed that no such raid took place.
The "activists" (a word used to describe people who care about issues that concern the people and decide to take some form of action, such as a demonstration or protest) are protesting against NATO wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya
and on NATO plans to expand its wars of aggression, aimed at securing oil and other wealth for the globalist elite
The National Lawyers Guild reports:
|CPD raid apartment in Bridgeport|
…Police broke down a door to access a
6-unit apartment building near 32nd & Morgan Streets without a
search warrant. Police entered an apartment with guns drawn and tackled
one of the tenants to the floor in his kitchen. Two tenants were
handcuffed for more than 2 hours in their living room while police
searched their apartment and a neighboring unit, repeatedly calling one
of the tenants a “Commie faggot.” A search warrant produced 4 hours
after police broke into the apartment was missing a judge’s signature,
according to witnesses. Among items seized by police in the Bridgeport
raid were beer-making supplies and at least one cell phone…
Chicago police brutality against peaceful demonstrators:
These kinds of raids are the “hallmark of National Special Security
Event,” says Sarah Gelsomino of the NLG and People’s Law Office.
Gelsomino is correct. In fact, Michael Ratner and Margaret Ratner
Kunstler document the “new paradigm of law enforcement” that is
preemptive policing in their book Hell No! Your Right to Dissent.
Kunstler and Ratner call it the domestic version of preemptive war. The doctrine of preemptive policing relies on:
…information about demonstration plans, organizers and participants collected in advance of events
to cancel protests and acts of dissent before any wrongdoing has
occurred. Even assuming that such intelligence is reliable (most of the
time police intelligence about protests is proven to be mistaken; the
majority of demonstrators and bystanders arrested are found to be
innocent of any crimes), the concept of relying on the ability of police
to predict violations of the law flies in the face of the First
Amendment. Well-established Constitutional law prohibits the government
in nearly all instances from exercising prior restraint of speech or
Preemptive raids and arrests happened ahead of the 2008 Republican
National Convention in St. Paul against the RNC Welcoming Committee and
they happened ahead of the 2000 Republican National Convention in
In addition to this report of a preemptive raid, the NLG adds the
police are “unlawfully detaining, searching and questioning NATO
…3 plainclothes police officers
unlawfully stopped, handcuffed, and searched a NATO protester on
Michigan Avenue and Wacker Drive at approximately 2pm today [Thursday,
May 17]. According to the protester, he did not consent to a search and
there was no probable cause to detain him. The police also photographed
and questioned him about where he was from, how he got to Chicago, how
long it took, what he was doing here, where he was staying, who he was
with, and how long he was planning to say in Chicago. The protester
refused to answer any questions and was eventually released…
Additionally, a copy of the Chicago police’s ground rules for media has made it on to the Internet. Here is a link to a copy of it. They come from Debra Kirby, chief of the Chicago Police Department Office of International Relations.
Highlights from the rules being put forward by police include:
No “cutting” in and out of police lines
will be permitted, or “going up against their backs.” Those who
follow protesters onto private property to document their actions
also will be subject to arrest if laws are broken.
Any member of the media who is arrested will have to go through the
same booking process as anyone else. Release of equipment depends on
what part the equipment played in the events that led to the arrest.
There will not be any quick personal recognizance bond just for media members…
…To date, the department has seen no evidence that protesters are
turning on media representatives as happened in New York. She urges
media to keep safety in mind and to “not become the story.”…
…Reporters who carry backpacks should be prepared to show their
content to police. You may be asked to fire up and demonstrate any
equipment that does not look familiar to officers.
There has been concern among journalists, especially independent
media, that the Chicago police will violate their press freedom like New
York police have violated journalists covering Occupy Wall Street.
Overall, it does not seem the police will be as wanton in violating
journalists. However, these ground rules leave a lot of openings for
individual cops to use their authority to interfere with press and also
Reporting on the current event above by Kevin Gosztola
In related news, the week that Trayvon Martin’s killing blew up as a national story,
another Black person died of her skin color on the west side of Chicago.
22-year-old Rekia Boyd was shot in the head Wednesday, March 21, and
died a day later in what was originally described as the shooting of a
couple in which the male partner was ‘armed.’ The ‘weapon,’ we now know,
was a cell phone—as deadly a weapon as the bag of skittles and the can
of iced tea that cost Trayvon Martin his life in Florida.