Image: Libyan Mahdi al-Harati of the US State Department, United Nations, and the UK Home Office (page 5, .pdf)-listed
terrorist organization, the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG),
addressing fellow terrorists in Syria. Harati is now commanding a Libyan
brigade operating inside of Syria attempting to destroy the Syrian
government and subjugate the Syrian population. Traditionally, this is
known as "foreign invasion."
by Tony Cartalucci
August 21, 2012
- US-led NATO forces armed, funded, trained, and
even provided air support for Libyan terrorists emanating out of Libya's
eastern Cyrenaica region - most notably Benghazi which had served as
the premier international terrorist recruiting ground in the world, according to the US Army's Combating Terrorism Center
, producing a percentage per capita of militants outstripping even that of Saudi Arabia.
Operating under the banner of the "Libyan Islamic Fighting Group" (LIFG), a US State Department
, British Home Office
, and United Nations
-listed international terrorist organization, and officially merged with Al Qaeda in 2007, its commanders including Abdul Hakim Belhaj
and Mahdi al-Harati
led NATO's military proxy forces on the ground as US, French, and British planes destroyed the nation from the air.
These very same commanders of this very same listed-terrorist
organization would then turn its cash, weapons, and fighters on Syria, as early as November 2011
, arriving on the Turkish-Syrian border to enjoy yet another NATO safe haven and logistical networks overseen by Western intelligence
along with US funding and arms laundered through Gulf Cooperative Council (GCC) members such as Qatar and Saudi Arabia.
In essence, just as Al Qaeda had served as an "Arab Foreign Legion" for
the US in Afghanistan in the 1980's during its inception, it once again
is serving as a foreign legion inside Syria, fighting Washington's proxy
war against the Syrian government.
It appears however that unlike in Afghanistan where Al Qaeda fought
alongside a sizable indigenous force against foreign Soviet troops, the
tactical environment is revered - where Washington's proxy terrorist
forces are foreigners facing a highly motivated, well organized, and
better armed indigenous Syrian Army.
US Machinations Unraveling
- Shareholders Face Liquidation
Coordinated attempts by NATO and its proxy forces to invade and overrun
the cities of Damascus and Aleppo in July and early August have failed,
with proxy forces being expelled after suffering sizable loses. An
attempt to decapitate Syria's leadership in a bombing in central
Damascus also fell flat, with high ranking officials quickly replaced,
followed quickly by a cohesive military counter offensive.
The bombing was also followed by the mysterious disappearance of Saudi Arabia's Bandar "Bush" Bin Sultan
, who if confirmed assassinated, may indicate that NATO's plans are suffering at even the highest levels of organization.
Compounding the West's attempts to overthrow the government of Syria, is
the increasing support Syria has been receiving due to Iranian efforts to assemble international forums
representing half of the world's population, condemning the support of
foreign interference and promoting alternatives to the violent
destabilization being carried out by the West. A 30 member conference
was held ahead of the annual Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) meeting in
Tehran, Iran - and another meeting will be held again on the sidelines
of NAM toward the end of August.
Image: An impressive counter to the so-called "Friends of
Syria" confabs held by Wall Street and London corporate-financier
interests in an attempt to sway global opinion toward a repeat of
Libya's destruction at NATO's hands, the International Consultative Conference hosed by Iran seeks to end the flow of foreign arms into
militant hands and resolve political differences through more civilized
With the tactical situation inside Syria deteriorating for Western
proxies and international consensus shifting in unprecedented directions
against Washington and London, shareholders in the West's latest
adventure appear to be making tacit moves to divest their support and
protect their own interests, lest they be left with the ignominious
results of an increasingly compounding failure.
Obama's Recent Threats
With this in mind, the US has been making increasingly unhinged
"Bush-esque" remarks regarding "weapons of mass destruction" in Syria
and attempting to expand the pretexts under which it could "militarily
intervene." Even the very "movement" of Syria's "unconventional weapons"
in a "threatening manner," US President Barack Obama claimed in a recent statement
, would constitute a "red line."
Obama claims that the US "fears" Syria's unconventional weapons "falling into the hands of the wrong people
If the US is willfully arming, funding, and threatening to back
militarily, listed Al Qaeda terrorist organizations, then whose hands is
the US referring to? And while the US struggles to foment victory in
Syria, it seems to have stretched its support for terrorism all the way
to Russia's Caucasus Mountains, reigniting violence there, linked to Al
Qaeda as well.
Image: The Washington Consensus' shrinking legitimacy is
proportionally matched to its increasingly untenable perpetuation. Its
unjustified, disastrous military adventure in Libya seems to have
resulted in a Pyrrhic victory, hobbling the institutions and legitimacy
it needed to likewise undermine and overthrow the Syrian government in a
timely fashion. Overstretched, it appears the West is even trying to
strike at Russia with terrorist proxies that now span from North Africa
all the way to the Caucasus Mountains.
To say that the US is overstretched is an understatement. It is
overstretched politically, economically, and tactically. It risks a
historically unprecedented collapse that would destroy all shareholders
invested in its increasingly unhinged and transparently illegitimate
ambitions. Nations, in particular GCC members, are beginning to realize
with acute alarm that their support of Washington's agenda is now
threatening their very self-preservation. A victory even at this point
would still likely be Pyrrhic.
No matter how well Syria goes for the West from this point on, the
mechanisms it has used to get here, including its "Responsibility to
Protect" doctrine, the legitimacy of the UN, the West's so-called
commitment to "human rights," and the narrative of the so-called "War on
Terror" have been undermined beyond salvage.
One can only imagine the mountains Washington is promising to move in
order to keep its allies lined up behind them, particularly the ruling
governments of Turkey and the GCC. For an elitist clique that has prided
itself in "realist" political discourse, it has become increasingly
surrealist. Whether or not Washington's allies mirror this surrealism
all the way to their own demise, remains to be seen.